<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defendability of a Social App</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insightstory.net/2009/01/05/defendability-of-a-social-app/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insightstory.net/2009/01/05/defendability-of-a-social-app/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prashant</title>
		<link>http://insightstory.net/2009/01/05/defendability-of-a-social-app/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Prashant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insightstory.net/?p=95#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Very crisp analysis here .  its not limited to startup or web 2.0 only . take example of Silicon valley . many countries are trying to replicate it but its failing every single attempt .  

when its comes to  web2.0 stuff  , strange thing is that most of the times the reason why a site clicks is totally alien to the core idea or proposition . 
what is the motive and cause of people who write wikipedia entries ?  best explanation till this day is given by  Clay Shirky  in his lecture on   cognitive surplus and heat sinks http://www.shirky.com/herecomeseverybody/2008/04/looking-for-the-mouse.html  

does it make sense . of course . can you count on your ability to channelize it around ur venture  ? No Way to know for sure  .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very crisp analysis here .  its not limited to startup or web 2.0 only . take example of Silicon valley . many countries are trying to replicate it but its failing every single attempt .  </p>
<p>when its comes to  web2.0 stuff  , strange thing is that most of the times the reason why a site clicks is totally alien to the core idea or proposition .<br />
what is the motive and cause of people who write wikipedia entries ?  best explanation till this day is given by  Clay Shirky  in his lecture on   cognitive surplus and heat sinks <a href="http://www.shirky.com/herecomeseverybody/2008/04/looking-for-the-mouse.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.shirky.com/herecomeseverybody/2008/04/looking-for-the-mouse.html</a>  </p>
<p>does it make sense . of course . can you count on your ability to channelize it around ur venture  ? No Way to know for sure  .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
